Carbon Markets and Blockchain, or Ronald Coase meets Satoshi Nakamoto

For carbon market integration to occur there are at least three conditions, first, there must be political will expressed through global, regional or bilateral agreements. Second, there must be some accounting recognition through the climate convention process, namely resolution of article 6 of the Paris Agreement. But there is also a third condition: there must be an institutional infrastructure to make carbon markets viable; for this, governments, or private agents, must deal with the high transaction costs of carbon market exchange.

Net-Zero Commitments make Madrid Carbon Market Letdown more Critical

For the second consecutive year, debate over carbon markets sullied the outcome of global climate change negotiations. COP25 in Madrid began with Article 6 on international mitigation cooperation as the only unfinished section of a rulebook for executing the Paris Agreement, and the wickedest problem on docket. A year of advance work and two weeks of deliberation proved insufficient, and Article 6 will again be front and center at COP26 in Glasgow in 2020. Why is Article 6 so contentious and what are the implications of another failure to resolve it?

Should every country on earth copy Sweden’s carbon tax?

Should every country on earth copy Sweden’s carbon tax?

Carbon pricing, meaning carbon taxes and emission trading schemes, is widely recognised as the most cost-effective way to reduce carbon emissions. A growing number of countries and jurisdictions are therefore implementing carbon pricing tools as well as strengthening existing once. Yet carbon pricing is, in the words of John Roome, Senior Director at the World Bank’s Climate Change Group, “nowhere near where it should be [as it] still covers only a small part of global emissions at prices too low to significantly reduce emissions”.

Carbon pricing is the way to rectify runaway climate change

Although climate change represents perhaps the largest, most complex economic opportunity since the industrial revolution(s), many investments are needed to make the transition. Most of the money required (up to 80%) needs to come from the private sector. It is therefore critical that the financial contributions from investors and business are unlocked.

The key? Putting a price on carbon emissions. There is enough evidence to suggest this is by far the best instrument to trigger investors and companies to move faster, especially when combined with other supporting policies.

Co-designing the Mexican Emissions Trading System Based on International Experience

Co-designing the Mexican Emissions Trading System Based on International Experience

The ETS Academy Mexico was held on July 23, 24 and 25, 2019 at Casa Lamm in Mexico City. It was a three-day seminar that brought together international experts with officials from different Federal Public Administration (APF) departments relevant to the development of an SCE, with the aim of learning the lessons learned and best practices of international jurisdictions, and facilitate the joint design of the SCE in Mexico.

Our Climate assembles climate mosaic to push price on pollution

Our Climate assembles climate mosaic to push price on pollution

On June 22nd, before the dome of the Massachusetts State House, a group of youth activists with Our Climate, a youth-led carbon pricing advocacy organization in the United States, assembled their largest climate mosaic yet. Nicholas O’Toole, a student at New York University and summer fellow with Our Climate, provides insights into the outcomes of the event and his vision for carbon pricing in Massachusetts in this CPLC blog.